Recommandations du CEPC pour l’inscription de produits chimiques

Composition of intersessional drafting groups (2013–2014)

Drafting group on methamidophos

Drafting group on fenthion (ultra low volume (ULV) formulations at or above 640 g active ingredient/L)

Decisions adopted by the Chemical Review Committee at its ninth meeting, including the rationale for the conclusion by the Chemical Review Committee that the notifications of final regulatory action submitted by Brazil and the European Union in respect of methamidophos meet the criteria of Annex II to the Rotterdam Convention

Methamidophos

CRC-9/3: Methamidophos

Decisions adopted by the Chemical Review Committee at its ninth meeting

Trichlorfon

CRC-9/1: Trichlorfon

Rationales and workplans for dicofol and trichlorfon

II. Trichlorfon

B. Workplan for the intersessional drafting group on trichlorfon

Rationales and workplans for dicofol and trichlorfon

I. Dicofol

Rationale for the conclusion by the Chemical Review Committee that the notification of final regulatory action for dicofol (CAS No. 115-32-2) submitted by the European Union meets the criteria of Annex II to the Rotterdam Convention

Decisions adopted by the Chemical Review Committee at its eighth meeting

perfluorooctane sulfonic acid, perfluorooctanesulfonates, perfluorooctanesulfonamides and perfluorooctanesulfonyls

CRC-8/6: Recommendation to the Conference of the Parties on the inclusion of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid, perfluorooctanesulfonates, perfluorooctanesulfonamides and perfluorooctanesulfonyls in Annex III to the Convention and on the draft decision guidance document for those substances

Decisions adopted by the Chemical Review Committee at its eighth meeting

pentabromodiphenyl ether and pentabromodiphenyl commercial mixtures

CRC-8/4: Recommendation to the Conference of the Parties on the inclusion of pentabromodiphenyl ether (CAS No. 32534-81-9) and pentabromodiphenyl ether commercial mixtures

Rationales, recommendations and workplans for chemicals for which two notifications met the criteria of Annex II

II. Perfluorooctane sulfonate, its salts, and precursors

C. Workplan for the intersessional drafting group on perfluorooctane sulfonic acid, its salts and perfluorooctane sulfonyl fluoride

Rationales, draft decisions and workplans for severely hazardous pesticide formulations for which proposals met the criteria of Annex IV

Paraquat

II. Recommendation to the Conference of the Parties on the inclusion of paraquat dichloride (formulated as emulsifiable concentrate of 276 g active ingredient/L or above, corresponding to paraquat ion at or above 200 g/L) as a severely hazardous pesticide formulation in Annex III to the Rotterdam Convention

Rationale for the chemical for which only one notification met the criteria of Annex II: rationale for the conclusion that the notification for pentachlorobenzene (QCB or PeCB) (CAS No. 608-93-5) submitted by Canada meets the criteria of Annex II to the Rotterdam Convention

Rationales, recommendations and workplans for chemicals for which two notifications met the criteria of Annex II

IV. Octabromodiphenyl ether commercial mixtures

B. Recommendation to the Conference of the Parties on the inclusion of octabromodiphenyl ether commercial mixtures in Annex III to the Rotterdam Convention

Rationales, recommendations and workplans for chemicals for which two notifications met the criteria of Annex II

III. Pentabromodiphenyl ether commercial mixtures

C. Workplan for the intersessional drafting group on pentabromodiphenyl ether

Rationales, recommendations and workplans for chemicals for which two notifications met the criteria of Annex II

III. Pentabromodiphenyl ether commercial mixtures

Rationale for the recommendation by the Chemical Review Committee to list tetrabromodiphenyl ether (tetraBDE) (CAS No. 40088-47-9, CAS No. 5436 43-1) and pentabromodiphenyl ether (pentaBDE) (CAS No. 32534-81-9, CAS No. 60348-60-9) as contained in pentabromodiphenyl ether commercial mixtures in Annex III to the Rotterdam Convention

Rationales, recommendations and workplans for chemicals for which two notifications met the criteria of Annex II

II. Perfluorooctane sulfonate, its salts, and precursors

A. Rationale for the recommendation by the Chemical Review Committee to list Perfluorooctanesulphonic acid (PFOS) (CAS No. 1763-23-1), PFOS potassium salt (CAS No. 2795-39-3), PFOS ammonium salt (CAS No. 29081-56-9), PFOS lithium salt (CAS No. 29457-72-5), PFOS diethanolamine salt (CAS No. 70225-14-8), Perfluorooctane sulfonyl fluoride (PFOSF or POSF) (CAS No. 307 35 7) in Annex III to the Rotterdam Convention

Rationales, recommendations and workplans for chemicals for which two notifications met the criteria of Annex II

I. Endosulfan

B. Recommendation to the Conference of the Parties on the inclusion of endosulfan in Annex III to the Rotterdam Convention

Recommendation to the Conference of the Parties on the decision guidance document for azinphos-methyl

Rationales, recommendations and workplans for chemicals for which two notifications met the criteria of Annex II

C. Workplan for the intersessional drafting group on azinphos-methyl

Rationales, recommendations and workplans for chemicals for which two notifications met the criteria of Annex II

A. Rationale for the recommendation that azinphos-methyl (CAS No. 86 50-0) should become subject to the prior informed consent procedure and an intersessional drafting group be established to prepare a draft decision guidance document

Recommendations to the Conference of the Parties:

Endosulfan

Rationales for those chemicals for which only one notification met the criteria of Annex II

B. Hexachlorobenzene: rationale for the conclusion that the notification for hexachlorobenzene (CAS No. 118-74-1) from Canada meets the information requirements of Annex I and the criteria of Annex II to the Rotterdam Convention

Rationales for those chemicals for which only one notification met the criteria of Annex II

A. Azinphos-methyl: rationale for the conclusion that the notification for azinphos-methyl (CAS No. 86-50-0) from Canada meets the information requirements of Annex I and the criteria of Annex II to the Rotterdam Convention

Endosulfan

3. Workplan for the intersessional drafting group on endosulfan

Endosulfan

1. Rationale as to how the notifications of final regulatory action on endosulfan (CAS No. 115-29-7) from Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, the Gambia, Mali, Mauritania, the Niger and Senegal meet the information requirements of Annex I and the criteria of Annex II to the Convention

Alachlor

A. Recommendation to the Conference of the Parties on the decision guidance document for alachlor

Rationales, recommendations and work plans for chemicals for which two notifications met the criteria of Annex II

B. Aldicarb

3. Workplan for the intersessional drafting group on aldicarb

Rationales, recommendations and work plans for chemicals for which two notifications met the criteria of Annex II

B. Aldicarb

1. Rationale for the recommendation by the Chemical Review Committee that aldicarb (CAS NO 116-06-3) should become subject to the prior informed consent procedure and for the decision by the Committee to establish an intersessional drafting group to prepare a draft decision guidance document

Rationales, recommendations and work plans for chemicals for which two notifications met the criteria of Annex II

A. Alachlor

2. Recommendation to the Conference of the Parties on the inclusion of Alachlor in Annex III of the Rotterdam Convention

Rationale for the conclusion by the Committee that the notification for endosulfan (CAS No. 115-29-7) from the European Community meets the criteria of Annex II of the Rotterdam Convention

Recommendations to the Conference of the Parties

Endosulfan

A. Recommendation to the Conference of the Parties on the decision guidance document for endosulfan

Rationales for those chemicals for which only one notification met the criteria of Annex II

D. Mirex: rationale for the conclusion that the notification for mirex (CAS No. 2385-85-5) from Canada meets the criteria of Annex II of the Rotterdam Convention

Rationales for those chemicals for which only one notification met the criteria of Annex II

B. Cyhexatin: rationale for the conclusion by the Committee that notification for Cyhexatin (CAS No. 13121-70-5) from Canada meets the criteria of Annex II of the Rotterdam Convention

Rationales, draft decisions and work plans for chemicals for chemicals for which two notifications met the criteria of Annex II

B. Tributyl tin

3. Work-plan for the intersessional drafting group on tributyltin compounds

Rationales, draft decisions and work plans for chemicals for chemicals for which two notifications met the criteria of Annex II

B. Tributyl tin

1. Rationale for the recommendation that all tributyl tin compounds should become subject to the prior informed consent procedure and to establish an intersessional drafting group to prepare a draft decision-guidance document

Rationales, draft decisions and work plans for chemicals for which two notifications met the criteria of Annex II

A. Endosulfan

2. Recommendation to the Conference of the Parties on the inclusion of endosulfan in Annex III of the Rotterdam Convention

Rationales for conclusions by the Committee that notifications had met the criteria of the Annex II of the Rotterdam Convention

E. Notification for carbon tetrachloride (CAS No 56-23-5) from Canada

Rationales for conclusions by the Committee that notifications had met the criteria of the Annex II of the Rotterdam Convention

C. Notification for benzidine (CAS No 92-87-5) and benzidine dihydrochloride (CAS No. 531 85-1) from Canada

Rationales for conclusions by the Committee that notifications had met the criteria of the Annex II of the Rotterdam Convention

A. Notification for methyl bromide (CAS No. 74-83-9) from the Netherlands

A. Process for drafting decision guidance documents